Home | About OC | Continuing Education | Course Schedule | Registration | Accommodations | About Dr. Chan | Study Club | Doctor Education | Patient Education  Vision |  Research Group | Science | Orthodontics | Laboratory | Dr. Chan’s Articles |  GNM Dentistry |  Contact Us  |  Dr. Chan’s Blogs | Finding a GNM Dentist

Physiologic Clarity – Bio-Physiologic Neuromuscular (Structural/Functional) Perspective

This is where our GNM approach diverges.

1. We don’t dismiss the emotional or neurological dimensions of pain, but we refuse to treat them in isolation from the structural realities of the stomatognathic system — we begin with restoring physiologic normalcy.
2. We measure. We verify. We treat the system, not just the symptoms.
3. Our protocols are anchored in objective neuromuscular science—TENS, EMG, ESG, CMS—not just narrative interpretation.
4. And we do so with ethical clarity, knowing that many patients have been dismissed or misled by well-meaning providers who lacked the tools to see what we see.

The biopsychosocial model has its place. Medicine and psychotherapy are often central in the psychosocial methodology—but they’re not the whole story.  When applied without structural discernment, it risks obscuring the cause rather than revealing it. That’s why our work matters. That’s why reproducibility, mentorship, and ethical stewardship remain central to OC’s mission.

• Bio-Psychosocial (Orofacial Pain) Perspective
• GNM is Not the Same as NM

This approach focuses on not only the subjective patient complaints, but also on objective assessment of the musculoskeletal occlusal signs and symptoms of TMD.

1. Measuring technology and instrumentation are used and include: 1) computerized mandibular tracking, 2) surface electromyography and 3) electrosonography of the TMJ.
2. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the sale of these devices for the purposes of measuring activity that directly relates to the TMJ. The medical necessity of their use for each patient must be documented by the treating dentist and certainly are non-invasive approaches to document medical necessity.
3. These devices have been found to be extremely useful in aiding the clinician to arrive at a diagnosis for conservative treatment.  NIDCR fails to even recognize such.
4. The use of objective quantifiable diagnostic procedures should be implemented to quantify and qualify a patient’s dysfunction. This certainly adds essential, accurate information in the effective diagnostic and treatment process especially for patients with trauma episodes to the head and cervical regions.

Subjective feelings and educated guesses when treating the mandible, masticatory muscles of the head and neck and the temporomandibular joints will not produce cost effective results nor appropriate treatment times!